ELIASON VS MCCONKIE

ELIASON VS MCCONKIE

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS IMMEDIATELY CLOSED EVERY TRUST ACCOUNT, BUSINESS ACCOUNT, AND PERSONAL ACCOUNT OF MAX D ELIASON SO AS TO PROHIBIT HIM FROM SECURING THE OUTSIDE LEGAL COUNSEL WHICH WOULD BE NECESSARY TO CHALLENGE THIS ILLEGAL EMBEZZLEMENT SCAM THAT QUALIFIES AS RICO ACT VIOLATIONS.

So now we have Kirton McConkie ille- gally representing Bryan and Lisa Stephens and also Mark and Laurie Eliason (brother and sister-in-law) and not the youngest sibling nor the client himself and who they told to “sue them” but illegally closed every source of capital required to litigate against the LDS Law Offices.

Despite the Trusts clearly showing that all litigation costs were covered by the Trusts, the Plaintiff has not had one dollar reimbursed and has been forced into going “Pro Se” since day one.

Utah Case No. 190901906

The first complaint was filed in the Third District Court of Utah in March of 2019 and the Judge assigned to the matter was the Honorable Judge Adam Mow.

The Plaintiff was forced to obtain his “Google Juris Doctorate” and to go up against the Law Offices of Kirton Mc- Conkie and their 150 attorneys without any court room experience and with- out the ability to contact his own father who he has not been permitted to see or talk to since April 17th, 2019.

It became apparent in December of 2019 that Judge Adam Mow was inten- tionally stalling the matter and refused to permit the victims to have a request- ed Ex-Parte Hearing (done under ur- gency) or even an injunction hearing ater the plaintiff had fought for seven months to have his day in court.

THIS COMPLAINT SITS ON THE DESK OF JUDGE ADAM MOW WHO REFUSES TO TAKE ANY ACTIONS DESPITE MULTI- PLE DEMANDS MADE FOR HIM TO REN- DER A DECISION ALONG WITH MULTI- PLE MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGE- MENT WHICH ALSO GO UNANSWERED

JUDGE ADAM MOW HAS BEEN ADDED AS A DEFENDANT FOR AIDING AND ABETTING KNOWN FELONS AND OB- STRUCTING JUSTICE RATHER THAN UPHOLDING THE US CONSTITUTION

ELIASON VS THE CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS

UT CASE No. 1:20-CV-00024-RJS-DBP

The Plaintiff expanded the matter and demonstrated that the “COP” was li- able to Max and Joyce Eliason with Kir- ton McConkie their acting agent and resubmitted the matter to the United States District Court for the District of Utah where Judge Jill Parrish immedi- ately chose to recuse herself ater real- izing she did not want to be the “black plague” on the LDS Church.

The complaint was assumed by Chief Judge Robert J Shelby on February 28th, 2020 and was filed under The RICO Act of 1970 for Racketeering and Organized Crime based on the 50+ felonies the Defendants have commit- ted over the past seven years which have been substantially proven in the 300 page complaint that corresponds to this case.

The US Laws surrounding the RICO Act violations clearly state that the Judge overseeing the complaint is obligated by law to engage the US Marshalls and to assign the United States Attorney General for the District of Utah for criminal prosecution from that point forward.

Among the remedies for victims under the provisions for Abuse of Power of Office which the law specifies is to be respected immediately is the cessation of hostilities against the victims (who have already suffered for seven years during this crime scene) and will ap- parently go unpunished unless a mem- ber of the United States Department of Justice Intervenes.

A SON WALKED INTO THE US COURTHOUSE AND FILED A PLEA FOR MERCY ON BEHALF OF THE VICTIMS AND WAS UNDER EXTREME DURESS AND REQUESTED THAT CHIEF JUDGE SHELBY FORCE KIRTON MCCONKIE TO “CEASE ALL HOSTILITIES” AND TO ADHERE TO THE US LAWS CONCERNING VICTIMS OF ABUSE OF POWER OF OFFICE. RATHER THAN ASK THE DEFENDANTS TO ACCOUNT FOR THE MISSING ASSETS, THE JUDGE IMMEDIATELY EXECUTED A DOCUMENT THAT EXTENDED THE TIME REQUIRED TO RESPOND TO TWO MONTHS EVEN THOUGH ALL PARTIES KNEW THE DEFENDANTS SAT IN CHECKMATE WITH NO POSSIBLE DEFENSE.

At the end of the two-month period ending in early May 2020; Kirton Mc- Conkie responded with 200 pages and did not answer one single allegation and still could not account for one pen- ny nor feels they are required to do so ater destroying an entire family.

THIS COMPLAINT SITS ON THE DESK OF CHIEF JUDGE ROBERT J SHELBY WHO REFUSES TO TAKE ANY ACTIONS DESPITE MULTIPLE DEMANDS MADE FOR HIM TO RENDER A DECISION ALONG WITH MULTIPLE MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT WHICH ALSO GO UNANSWERED.

ELIASON VS SHELBY

CO CASE No. 1:20-CV-00959-PAB-SKC

Upon the realization that Chief Judge Shelby was a Chief Judge of “Jesus Christ Himself”, the plaintiff immedi- ately filed the complaint with the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver Col- orado hoping the Judges outside of Utah would be impartial and not com- mit Aiding and Abetting known felons and becoming participants and co-de- fendants in the largest “Mafiacracy” which has ever existed.

The Plaintiff filed for an Injunction Hearing with the Court and filed sever- al Proposed orders requiring Kirton Mc- Conkie produce accounting on behalf of the Eliason Estates but every single request has gone unheard.

THIS COMPLAINT SITS ON THE DESK OF CHIEF JUDGE PHILLIP A BRIMMER WHO REFUSES TO TAKE ANY ACTIONS DESPITE MULTIPLE DEMANDS MADE FOR HIM TO RENDER A DECISION ALONG WITH MULTIPLE MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT WHICH ALSO GO UNANSWERED TWO YEARS AFTER KIRTON MCCONKIE ADMITTED THEY WERE GUILTY.

THE DEFENDANTS HAVE NEVER EVEN RESPONDED TO THIS MATTER EVEN THOUGH THEY ARE REQUIRED BY FED- ERAL LAW TO DO SO WITHIN 21 DAYS OR BE SUBJECT TO A SUMMARY JUDGEMENT. THEY ARE FEARLESS SINCE THEY “OWN” THE US DISTRICT JUDGES IN ADDITION TO THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL

ELIASON VS THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

IN THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT

When it was realized that each of the prior three judges from the Districts of Utah and Colorado had all refused to follow the Federal Law concerning RICO Violations with no intention of ever upholding their positions as Chief and District Judges, the Plaintiff had nowhere else let to file but within the United States Supreme Court which was done in May of 2020.

Although the Supreme Court is typical- ly known as an appellate court which would require a decision from the low- er courts prior to them ever hearing the matter; there is also a provision which states that any matter which includes a Public Minister or Public Servant is re- quired by US Law to have its original jurisdiction in the Supreme Court since the associated Judges are Presidential Appointments.

Whereas the matter was a RICO Act vio- lation, it requires that the United States Attorney General William Barr prosecute the matter once the com- plaint was presented before the body of the Supreme Court.

It would soon be discovered that Brother Dallin H Oaks is a two time nominee to the United States Supreme Court and is tied very closely to William Barr through the Law Offices of Kirk- land Ellis in Chicago to which Dallin H Oaks is a lifetime partner and it was therefore not much of a surprise to have the 40 bound copies returned stating that it was an improper jurisdic- tion even though the law is very clear concerning the mandatory submission to the Supreme Court.

The office of William Barr and the Unit- ed States Ombudsman also sent a re- sponse letter back to the victims at the same time concerning a request that the US Department of Justice intervene on behalf of the Victims and stated that “no crimes had been committed and that their office was closing the matter and that the case was closed perma- nently” (without ever asking one ques- tion as to the 50 Felony allegations within the 300 page complaint). THE LAW OFFICES OF KIRTON MCCONKIE IS COMMITTING A SECOND-DEGREE FELONY BY REPRESENTING TWO OF THE THREE SIBLINGS AND THEIR SPOUSES BUT NOT “ME”